{"issue_text":"Whether material disputes of fact exist rendering the application incapable of resolution without oral evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dispute over share percentage held by Bryony; dispute over property inclusion in share sale; dispute over Bryony's continued directorship"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the resolution authorizing litigation was validly passed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Dispute over whether Scroobys retained directorship after share sale"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant company sought eviction of respondent from residential premises in Kwekwe. The respondent claimed he acquired rights to the property through purchasing 100% shareholding in the applicant company from Bryony Scrooby, who allegedly held herself out as sole shareholder. The applicant disputed this, claiming Bryony only held 50% shares and lacked authority to transfer the property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases