Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

J Romo v P.G. Timbers

LC/H/155/14

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
28 March 2014
Citation
LC/H/155/14
Neutral Citation
[2014] ZWLC 155
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L Kudya
Full Bench
L Kudya
Areas of Law
Labour lawCivil procedureEvidence
Keywords
Heads of argumentAttachmentsCitationEmployer identityPG TimbersPG Industries
Tags
Labour appealProcedural points in limineCitation of partiesEvidence in heads of argument
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Court Rules
  • Labour Court Rules
  • Labour Court Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether documents attached to heads of argument are admissible as evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Two documents attached to respondent's heads of argument"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether appellant cited the wrong party by citing PG Timbers instead of PG Industries","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"PG Timbers is subsidiary of PG Industries; payslip issued by PG Industries; contract references both"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant challenged the respondent's inclusion of two documents as attachments to its heads of argument, arguing this amounted to leading evidence improperly. The respondent also raised a point in limine that the appellant cited the wrong party, claiming PG Timbers (not PG Industries) was the employer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →