illegal contractstamp duty evasioncapital gains taxpublic policyex turpi causa
Tags
specific performanceillegal agreementshare saletax evasion
legislation
Statutes Cited
Stamp Duties Act
Capital Gains Tax Act
Income Tax Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court can enforce an agreement tainted by illegality where the parties sought to evade tax","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Both agreements facilitated tax evasion; parties concealed true consideration"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to enforce a share sale agreement by which he purchased 100% shares in Lochinvar Properties. Two conflicting agreements existed: one reflecting the true purchase price of Z$1.8 billion, and a second showing Z$900 million used to reduce stamp duty and capital gains tax. The court found the entire transaction illegal as both agreements facilitated tax evasion.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases