Gazetted LandConsequential Provisions ActUnlawful OccupationEvictionSpecial Power of Attorney
Tags
Gazetted LandUnlawful OccupationEviction
legislation
Statutes Cited
Gazetted Land [Consequential Provisions] Act
Gazetted Land [Consequential Provisions] Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants had lawful authority to occupy Plot 5","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Occupation without offer letter/permit/lease; District Administrator letter; Special Power of Attorney"}
{"issue_text":"Whether 72-hour eviction period was reasonable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Families residing on plot; harvesting activities"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants were convicted of unlawfully occupying Plot 5, Lindely of Railway 22 Farm from May 2019 to October 2024 without lawful authority under the Gazetted Land [Consequential Provisions] Act. They were ordered to pay fines and vacate within 72 hours.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases