Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Innscor Franchising Zimbabwe (Stores 13) v Andrew Timbe

HH 431-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
21 March 2017
Citation
HH 431-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 431
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Mwayera J
Full Bench
Mawayera JMunangati-Manongwa J
Areas of Law
Contract lawCommercial law
Keywords
Potato supply contractPayment for goods deliveredContractual obligations
Tags
Contract lawSale of goodsPayment dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • o
  • r
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • r
  • e
  • f
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • e
  • d
  • t
  • o
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was liable to pay for the remaining 252 pockets of potatoes","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delivery of 609 pockets, payment for 357, refusal to pay for 252"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding that respondent proved his case","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Evidence of delivery and partial payment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant received 609 pockets of potatoes from the respondent in December 2014, paid for 357 pockets, but refused to pay for the remaining 252 pockets claiming they did not meet required standards. The court a quo found the appellant liable for the outstanding balance.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →