Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Indium Investments (Private) Limited v Kingshaven (Private) Limited & 2 Ors

HH 157-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
22 May 2013
Citation
HH 157-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 157
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Hungwe J
Full Bench
Hungwe J
Areas of Law
Commercial lawContract lawProperty law
Keywords
Pactum commissoriumSimulationSham transactionShare sale agreementLease agreementBuy-back option
Tags
Share transferLoan agreementPactum commissoriumSimulation
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Exchange Control Regulations, 1996
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Zimbabwean share sale and lease agreements are simulations/shams","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Identical figures in SA loan and Zim agreements; no share valuation; buy-back option"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether annexure \"C\" constitutes pactum commissorium","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Transfer of company control without payment; Shumba's weak bargaining position"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff claimed eviction of defendants from property based on share sale and lease agreements. Defendants contended these agreements were mere simulations to secure a loan and constituted pactum commissorium. The court found the agreements were shams designed to circumvent exchange control laws and constituted pactum commissorium.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →