{"issue_text":"Whether the Zimbabwean share sale and lease agreements are simulations/shams","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Identical figures in SA loan and Zim agreements; no share valuation; buy-back option"}
{"issue_text":"Whether annexure \"C\" constitutes pactum commissorium","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Transfer of company control without payment; Shumba's weak bargaining position"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff claimed eviction of defendants from property based on share sale and lease agreements. Defendants contended these agreements were mere simulations to secure a loan and constituted pactum commissorium. The court found the agreements were shams designed to circumvent exchange control laws and constituted pactum commissorium.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases