{"issue_text":"Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties not living together, protection order issued, defendant's adultery, plaintiff's loss of affection"}
{"issue_text":"What constitutes movable matrimonial property and how it should be shared","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property acquired during marriage"}
{"issue_text":"Whether parties own a general dealer's shop subject to distribution","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's perception of shop ownership"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in January 2005 and had one child. The plaintiff sued for divorce in June 2010 alleging irretrievable breakdown due to defendant's abusive conduct, adultery, and incompatibility. The defendant denied breakdown and counter-claimed regarding immovable property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases