Architects (Conditions of Engagement and Scale of Fees) By-Laws
Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) (Amendment of Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act and Issue of Real Time Gross Settlement Electronic Dollars (RTGS Dollars)) Regulations
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff is entitled to default judgment for architectural services rendered","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant failed to defend after plea struck out; plaintiff substantiated claims"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the quantification of claims at 4.5% of construction cost is appropriate","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claims based on SI 829 of 1980; no supervision fees included"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff architectural firm provided architectural designs for tourism facilities to be constructed in Victoria Falls for a 2013 UNWTO conference. After the defendant failed to pay for the services rendered, the plaintiff sued for payment. The defendant's plea was struck out, leading to this default judgment application.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases