Water tariffsUltra viresAudi alteram partemDiscriminationStatutory instrument
Tags
Water tariffsStatutory regulationsUltra viresNatural justice
legislation
Statutes Cited
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Administrative Justice Act
Water Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister acted ultra vires the Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act in publishing the tariff regulations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Minister published regulations without ZINWA application; agreements provide for different review mechanisms"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the regulations violated the audi alteram partem rule","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants were not consulted before tariff increase"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the regulations violated s 56 of the Constitution by discriminating against the applicants","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Only commercial agriculture estates affected; other sectors had charges reduced or maintained"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Two sugar companies challenged regulations published by the Minister increasing their water tariffs, arguing the Minister acted ultra vires the enabling Act and violated their constitutional rights and natural justice principles.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases