PAYEIncome Tax ActForeign CurrencyRemuneration in Kind
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
o
n
t
e
m
p
t
o
f
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
a
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
J
u
r
i
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
7
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
9
5
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
M
a
g
i
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
'
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
0
C
r
o
w
n
C
o
u
r
t
(
A
d
v
a
n
c
e
N
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
E
x
p
e
r
t
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
)
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
8
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
2
0
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
6
(
r
i
g
h
t
t
o
a
f
a
i
r
t
r
i
a
l
)
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
8
(
r
i
g
h
t
t
o
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
f
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
n
d
f
a
m
i
l
y
l
i
f
e
)
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
1
0
(
f
r
e
e
d
o
m
o
f
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
)
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
1
4
(
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
d
i
s
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether fuel coupons and food hampers provided to employees constitute remuneration in foreign currency requiring PAYE payment in foreign currency","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant provided fuel coupons and food hampers; obtained using foreign currency; employees could redeem for foreign currency; applicant paid tax in local currency"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a transport operator, provided fuel coupons and food hampers to employees as part of remuneration during November 2008, December 2008 and January 2009. The respondent (Commissioner General) contended this constituted foreign currency remuneration requiring PAYE payment in foreign currency, while the applicant argued it was local currency remuneration.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases