Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Helensville Construction (Pvt) Ltd v Kadoma City Council

HH 434-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
25 July 2018
Citation
HH 434-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 434
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
CHAREWA J
Full Bench
CHAREWA J
Areas of Law
Commercial LawContract Law
Keywords
arbitration clausespecial pleadispute resolutionbreach of contract
Tags
Contract LawArbitrationSpecial Plea
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • None cited
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the special plea that dispute should be referred to arbitration should be upheld","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract contains clauses 24 and 25 for dispute resolution; no project manager decision is disputed"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether clauses 24 and 25 constitute a valid arbitration clause ousting court jurisdiction","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clause 25 states \"Either party may refer a decision of the Adjudicator to an Arbitrator\""}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff sued defendant for payment of $34,378.06 for services rendered and $50,441.49 for damages for breach of contract. The defendant terminated the contract alleging plaintiff's breach and raised a special plea that the dispute should be referred to arbitration in terms of the contract's dispute resolution mechanism.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →