arbitrationlease agreementrental disputeappointment of arbitrator
Tags
arbitrationlease disputerental escalation
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether court has power to authorise second respondent to appoint arbitrator under Article 11(4) of Model Law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties agreed on arbitration procedure but failed to appoint arbitrator; respondent failed to act under agreed procedure"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Commercial Rent Board should determine rental dispute instead of arbitration","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent argued matter should go to Commercial Rent Board; lease contained arbitration clauses"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant (Harare Sports Club) and first respondent (Zimbabwe Cricket) entered into a lease agreement in 1999 for cricket facilities. A dispute arose regarding rental escalation from USD170 to USD3000 monthly. The lease contained arbitration clauses but parties failed to agree on appointment of arbitrator, prompting applicant to seek court intervention.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases