notice of responsereplication submissionscondonationstriking out
Tags
procedural irregularitieslate filingcourt rules
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Court Rules, Statutory Instrument 59 of 2006
Labour Court Rules, Statutory Instrument 59 of 2006
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's notice of response filed 2 days out of time should be accepted","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Response filed 6 November 2015, due 4 November 2015"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the \"Respondent's Replication Submissions\" filed without leave should be struck out","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Document filed 1 February 2016, 2 months after heads of argument, without court leave"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant raised two procedural points in limine challenging the respondent's late filing of a notice of response (2 days late) and the filing of an unauthorized document titled "Respondent's Replication Submissions" filed 2 months late without court leave.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases