{"issue_text":"Whether the Land Commission (Gazetted Land) (Disposal In Lieu of Compensation) Regulations, 2020 are ultra vires s 21 as read with s 17 of the Land Commission Act","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Regulations made under s 21 as read with s 17 of Act; regulations provide for disposal of land"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the regulations are inconsistent with s 293 of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Regulations provide for alienation of agricultural land; s 293 requires Act of Parliament for alienation procedures"}
{"issue_text":"Whether regulations violate applicant's constitutional rights to property, administrative justice and fair hearing","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant fears eviction without compensation or hearing"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a beneficiary of Zimbabwe's land reform programme, challenged the constitutional validity of the Land Commission (Gazetted Land) (Disposal In Lieu of Compensation) Regulations, 2020 (S.I. 62 of 2020) which allowed former landowners to reclaim title to land that had been compulsorily acquired by the State. The applicant argued the regulations violated constitutional property rights and were ultra vires the enabling legislation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases