evictionarrear rentalsholding over damagesagreement of salelocus standiactio rei vindicatio
Tags
evictionproperty rightsagreement of salearrear rentalsholding over damages
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
o
n
t
e
m
p
t
o
f
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
9
5
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there was a valid agreement of sale between late Matumba and late Shuro","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's occupation since 2001-2002; alleged written agreement; payment of purchase price"}
{"issue_text":"Whether first respondent had locus standi to sue for eviction","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property ceded to first respondent in 2006; she was not title holder but registered purchaser"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arrear rentals and holding over damages were proved","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent claimed $200 monthly rental; no evidence of fair rental value"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant had locus standi to demand cession of property","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant not appointed executrix dative; estate of late Shuro never registered"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant occupied property originally purchased by the first respondent's late husband from the City of Masvingo. The first respondent, as surviving spouse, had the property ceded to her after her husband's death and sought eviction of the appellant who claimed to have purchased the property from the deceased. The High Court found no valid sale agreement and ordered eviction with arrear rentals and holding over damages.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases