{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award was in conflict with public policy due to breach of natural justice","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's failure to decide recusal application, referral to two men tribunal, disregard of court order"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator properly handled the recusal application","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Conflicting evidence about when recusal was determined, parties' agreement to two men tribunal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator's disregard of Justice Chigumba's order violated public policy","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Court order declaring referral unlawful, arbitrator proceeding despite order"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award should be set aside under Article 34(2)(ii) of Arbitration Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Breach of natural justice, conflict with public policy"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
This was an application for the setting aside of an arbitral award made by the third respondent (arbitrator) on 6 December 2016. The applicant alleged the award was contrary to public policy due to breaches of natural justice, including improper referral of recusal application to a two men tribunal, failure to deal with recusal application, and disregard of court orders.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases