prescriptioncontinuing unfair labour practiceaccommodation allowancemarket salaryarbitral award review
Tags
prescriptionarbitral awardunfair labour practiceaccommodation allowancesalary arrears
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent's claim had prescribed when lodged in October 2013","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Promotion occurred by 2009, complaint lodged 2013-10-28"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent entitled to accommodation allowance of $200 per month from 2009","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No housing allowance policy, $200 rate based on external rentals"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent entitled to $16,380 as arrear salaries","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claim based on alleged market salary of $800, no evidence led"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employee claimed unpaid allowances and salary adjustments dating back to 2009. Employer argued claim prescribed. Arbitrator found claim not prescribed and awarded allowances and salary arrears. Employer appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases