{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award violates public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitral award entered on 26 November 2021, Gladys's counter-claim dismissed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator violated natural justice by ignoring submissions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Gladys's submissions in support of counter-claim"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award has been registered for enforcement purposes","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Joosab's application HC 66/22 for registration"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Gladys provided complete record of arbitration proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Missing documents including statements of claim, defence, submissions, transcript, valuation reports"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Gladys Svosve leased property from Khaled Kassim Joosab in 2008 and entered into a property swap option agreement. Following a dispute, Joosab invoked arbitration under clause 14.1 of the lease agreement. The arbitrator entered judgment for Joosab and dismissed Gladys's counter-claim. Gladys applied to set aside the arbitral award, claiming it violated public policy and natural justice.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases