{"issue_text":"Whether an application for condonation can introduce new issues in heads of argument that were not addressed in the founding affidavit","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Founding affidavit did not address explanation for delay or prospects of success"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a deponent who did not personally witness proceedings can swear positively to those facts in a founding affidavit","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's wife deposed to facts about disciplinary hearing she did not attend"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought condonation for late noting of an appeal against his employer. The application was brought by the applicant's wife through a power of attorney, but the founding affidavit contained hearsay evidence about disciplinary proceedings that the deponent could not personally attest to.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases