Irretrievable breakdownBest interests of the childCustodyMaintenanceAccess rights
Tags
DivorceChild custodyMaintenanceDivision of movable property
legislation
Statutes Cited
Marriage Act
Matrimonial Causes Act
Guardianship of Minors Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties separated since 2010, no communication, lost love and affection"}
{"issue_text":"Which parent should be awarded custody of the minor child","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Child with defendant for 3 years, plaintiff unemployed, defendant employed, child's stable environment"}
{"issue_text":"What access rights should the non-custodial parent have","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties' proposals for holiday access"}
{"issue_text":"How much maintenance should be paid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties' income, child's needs"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married on 27 June 2006 and have one minor child born 25 October 2007. The plaintiff sought divorce on grounds of irretrievable breakdown, custody, maintenance and division of property. Both parties agreed the marriage had broken down but disputed the reasons. The main contested issue was custody of the minor child.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases