Immovable propertyTransfer of ownershipAgreement of saleSpecific performance
Tags
Property transferAgreement of saleSpecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
–
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
,
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
i
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
i
s
q
u
o
t
e
d
,
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
o
r
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
.
#
#
#
O
T
H
E
R
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the 1st respondent is obliged to transfer ownership after receiving full payment","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Full payment received, applicant in occupation, 1st respondent disappeared"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
In 1991, the applicant purchased immovable property from the 1st respondent, paid the full purchase price of ZW$160,000, and took possession. Despite full payment, the 1st respondent failed to transfer ownership and disappeared, only resurfacing in 2016 attempting to evict the applicant.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases