Special pleaArbitration clausePayment disputeCivil engineering contract
Tags
Contract disputePayment claimArbitration clause
legislation
Statutes Cited
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Human Rights Act 1998
European Convention on Human Rights, art 6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's claim for payment for services rendered constitutes a dispute that must be referred to arbitration under clause 15(2) of the agreement","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Services rendered, payment not made, no substantive dispute alleged"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a civil engineering design consultancy, entered into an agreement with the first respondent (Great Zimbabwe University) and second respondent in January 2013 to provide civil engineering services for campus construction projects. After completion of works totaling US$9,239,059.45, the applicant claimed its half share of US$4,660,117.49. The first respondent failed to pay despite demand and raised a special plea that the matter should be referred to arbitration.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases