{"issue_text":"Whether the Constitution of Zimbabwe directly or indirectly allows for the 'diaspora vote'","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Constitutional provisions on voting rights and residency requirements"}
{"issue_text":"Whether section 23 of the Electoral Act violates section 67(3) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Residency requirements for voter registration"}
{"issue_text":"Whether section 72 of the Electoral Act violates sections 56(1), (3) and (4) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Postal voting provisions and alleged discrimination"}
{"issue_text":"Whether international conventions and electoral laws influence interpretation of Zimbabwean electoral laws","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and other international instruments"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Three Zimbabwean citizens living abroad sought to participate in the 2018 harmonized general elections but were precluded by residency requirements in the Electoral Act. They challenged the constitutionality of sections 23 and 72 of the Electoral Act, arguing these provisions violated their voting rights under the Constitution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases