{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff established a prima facie case for commission based on total investment value","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Written mandate terms, alleged verbal agreements, investment amount"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff, an agent mandated to sell the first defendant's mine or secure a joint venture partner, claimed 10% commission on a $2.4 million investment. The defendants disputed liability, arguing the written mandate limited commission to 10% of $600,000 regardless of sale price or investment value.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases