Freda Rebecca Mine v A Magarasadza & 17 Ors

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in finding employer approached with \"dirty hands\"","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator made finding not raised by parties"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator misdirected in failing to find issue was aspect of another case","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claim for benefits vs previous dismissal matter"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether proceedings violated s 124(1) regarding multiple proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Related matters before different arbitrators"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator directed compliance with Kare's award","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator mentioned but didn't order compliance"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in finding duress/undue influence","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Two employees signed contracts under alleged duress"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in ordering payment of benefits","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Whether benefits were contractually due"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in ordering reinstatement","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Reinstatement not sought by workers"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in awarding costs","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Costs awarded against employer"}

Background