Forrester Estate (Private) Ltd v Batsirai Chipembere and 10 Others and The Minister of Lands, Land Reform and Resettlement N.O. and The District Administrator, Mazowe District N.O.
Land acquisitionSpoliationBIPPAICSID arbitrationOffer lettersResettlement
Tags
Land reformSpoliationConstitutional land acquisitionBilateral investment agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act
Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant can claim spoliation when the property has been lawfully acquired by the State","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property acquired under s 16B, respondents hold offer letters"}
{"issue_text":"Whether it is permissible for the Government to resettle people while international arbitration is pending","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"ICSID arbitration pending since October 2010"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant company, former owner of Elsinora farm in Mazowe district, sought eviction of 10 respondents who were resettled on the property after it was acquired by the State. The property was subject to international arbitration proceedings at ICSID under a bilateral investment agreement between Zimbabwe and Germany.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases