{"issue_text":"Whether the first and second respondents acted arbitrarily when they forfeited the appellant's mining rights without giving it prior notice and the right to make representations","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No prior notice given; forfeiture notice only posted on office notice board; appellant learned of forfeiture incidentally"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a government-owned company, had its mining block (Mirage 3) forfeited by the second respondent without prior notice. When the appellant inquired about outstanding fees to facilitate a sale, it was informed the claim had been forfeited on 5 June 2020. The appellant obtained an interim order suspending the forfeiture, but the High Court later confirmed the forfeiture, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases