Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Fidelity Printers and Refiners (Private) Limited v The Minister of Mines and Mining Development N.O. & 2 Ors

SC 107/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
2022
Citation
SC 107/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 107
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
CHIWESHE JA
Full Bench
MAVANGIRA JACHIWESHE JACHATUKUTA JA
Areas of Law
Administrative lawMining lawNatural justice
Keywords
Mining block forfeitureNotice requirementsAudi alteram partemAdministrative Justice ActNatural justice
Tags
Mining lawAdministrative justiceNatural justiceForfeitureProcedural fairness
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 2
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • l
  • i
  • a
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • r
  • y
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • s
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • r
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • H
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • e
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • (
  • A
  • d
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 8
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • r
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • (
  • n
  • o
  • w
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • r
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • )
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • ,
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • E
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
  • I
  • n
  • q
  • u
  • i
  • r
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • F
  • r
  • e
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • m
  • o
  • f
  • I
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • D
  • a
  • t
  • a
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 8
  • P
  • u
  • b
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • S
  • e
  • r
  • v
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • O
  • m
  • b
  • u
  • d
  • s
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 7
  • (
  • d
  • r
  • a
  • f
  • t
  • b
  • i
  • l
  • l
  • r
  • e
  • f
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • )
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 5
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the first and second respondents acted arbitrarily when they forfeited the appellant's mining rights without giving it prior notice and the right to make representations","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No prior notice given; forfeiture notice only posted on office notice board; appellant learned of forfeiture incidentally"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant, a government-owned company, had its mining block (Mirage 3) forfeited by the second respondent without prior notice. When the appellant inquired about outstanding fees to facilitate a sale, it was informed the claim had been forfeited on 5 June 2020. The appellant obtained an interim order suspending the forfeiture, but the High Court later confirmed the forfeiture, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →