{"issue_text":"Whether the matter had prescribed under section 94 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matter referred two months after dismissal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant was unfairly dismissed","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No disciplinary hearing; no employment code followed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant was underpaid wages","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's letter suggesting salary reduction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant teacher employed by respondent school from January 2010 to November 2012 was dismissed on 27 October 2012 following a dispute over examination administration. He claimed unfair dismissal, nonpayment and underpayment of wages. The arbitrator dismissed his case on prescription grounds.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases