Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

FARAI MADONDO versus TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING FOR THE LASHLEY TRUST and SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT

HH 471-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 September 2021
Citation
HH 471-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 471
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
CHINAMORA J
Full Bench
CHINAMORA J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract Law
Keywords
Agreement of saleProperty transferBuy-back clauseInterdictSpecific performance
Tags
Property transferAgreement of saleInterdictSpecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • w
  • a
  • s
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • r
  • t
  • y
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application meets the requirements for urgency","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property being offered for sale, need for immediate intervention"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there are material disputes of fact requiring oral evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged refund of $44,000, incomplete buy-back clause"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement of sale is valid and binding","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Signed agreement, full payment made, no valid cancellation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to specific performance and an interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Valid agreement, property being sold to others, irreparable harm"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought an interdict and specific performance regarding a property he purchased from the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent attempted to sell the property to another party despite having signed an agreement of sale with the applicant on 2 February 2021.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →