{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator exceed his terms of reference by addressing conceded claims for leave, gratuity and consumables?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant acknowledged these items in its response"}
{"issue_text":"Was the arbitrator obliged to consider late-filed evidence on loan set-off and bank salary payments?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Supplementary filings dated 28 Sep 2015, after award"}
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator err by failing to calculate statutory deductions on the awarded amount?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award stated \"less statutory deductions\" without quantifying"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A security guard employed for over 11 years claimed terminal benefits including unpaid wages, leave pay, gratuity and consumables. The employer acknowledged part of the claim. After arbitration awarded $6,187.48 plus items, the employer appealed, challenging the arbitrator's consideration of conceded items, failure to address set-off for a loan, and omission to calculate statutory deductions.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases