criminal nuisanceexception to chargecause of actionstatutory compliance
Tags
criminal nuisanceexception to chargeconstitutional challengeprocedural defect
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Supreme Court Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether exception using \"cause of action\" instead of \"offence\" is valid","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants' exception wording"}
{"issue_text":"Whether s 2(v) of 3rd Schedule is unconstitutional","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Vagueness of provision"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellants erected billboard warning public about litigation over property. Augur Investments charged them with criminal nuisance. Appellants excepted to charge on grounds it disclosed no "cause of action" rather than no "offence" as required by statute.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases