Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Exodus and Company (Private) Limited v Sicilia Virginia Shavi

HH 510-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
22 September 2021
Citation
HH 510-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 510
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Manzunzu J
Full Bench
Muremba JManzunzu J
Areas of Law
Contract LawBanking & Finance
Keywords
sanctity of contractcurrency conversionexchange ratestatutory instruments
Tags
contract lawcurrency conversionproperty sale
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
  • Investigatory Powers Act 2016
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • European Convention on Human Rights (Art 6, Art 8)
  • Senior Courts Act 1981
  • Supreme Court Act 1981
  • Criminal Appeal Act 1968
  • Criminal Appeal Act 1995
  • Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
  • Prosecution of Offences Act 1996
  • Crime and Disorder Act 1998
  • Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • Criminal Justice Act 1991
  • Criminal Justice Act 2003
  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
  • Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005
  • Terrorism Act 2000
  • Terrorism Act 2006
  • Counter-Terrorism Act 2008
  • Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015
  • Data Protection Act 1998
  • Data Protection Act 2018
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • Official Secrets Act 1989
  • Interception of Communications Act 1985
  • Security Service Act 1989
  • Intelligence Services Act 1994
  • Justice and Security Act 2013
  • Constitutional Reform Act 2005
  • Courts Act 2003
  • Courts and Legal Services Act 1990
  • Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
  • Access to Justice Act 1999
  • Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
  • Civil Procedure Act 1997
  • Arbitration Act 1996
  • Limitation Act 1980
  • Prescription Act 1832
  • Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984
  • Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995
  • Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
  • Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1991
  • Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1997
  • Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Order 2001
  • Brussels Convention 1968
  • Brussels I Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
  • Brussels I Recast Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012
  • Lugano Convention 1988
  • Lugano Convention 2007
  • Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005
  • Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2019
  • Rome Convention 1980
  • Rome I Regulation (EC) No 593/2008
  • Rome II Regulation (EC) No 864/2007
  • Rome III Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010
  • Maintenance Regulation (EU) No 4/2009
  • Succession Regulation (EU) No 650/2012
  • Matrimonial Property Regulation (EU) No 2016/1103
  • Property Consequences Regulation (EU) No 2016/1104
  • Insolvency Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
  • Insolvency Regulation (EU) 2015/848
  • Service Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007
  • Evidence Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
  • Small Claims Regulation (EC) No 861/2007
  • Payment Order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006
  • European Enforcement Order Regulation (EC) No 805/2004
  • European Order for Payment Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006
  • European Small Claims Procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007
  • Mediation Directive 2008/52/EC
  • Legal Aid Directive 2002/8/EC
  • Consumer Protection Cooperation Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004
  • Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC
  • Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU
  • Unfair Terms Directive 93/13/EEC
  • Product Liability Directive 85/374/EEC
  • Package Travel Directive 2015/2302/EU
  • Timeshare Directive 2008/122/EC
  • Distance Selling Directive 97/7/EC
  • Doorstep Selling Directive 85/577/EEC
  • E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC
  • Electronic Signatures Directive 1999/93/EC
  • Electronic Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC
  • Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC
  • Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive 2002/58/EC
  • General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679
  • Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680
  • Network and Information Systems Directive 2016/1148
  • Cybersecurity Act (EU) 2019/881
  • Digital Services Act (EU) 2022/2065
  • Digital Markets Act (EU) 2022/1925
  • Artificial Intelligence Act (EU) 2024/1689
  • Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC
  • Copyright Directive 2019/790
  • Trademark Directive 2015/2436
  • Design Directive 98/71/EC
  • Patent Directive 98/44/EC
  • Biotech Directive 98/44/EC
  • Software Directive 2009/24/EC
  • Database Directive 96/9/EC
  • Rental Right Directive 2006/115/EC
  • Resale Right Directive 2001/84/EC
  • Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC
  • Customs Regulation (EU) No 608/2013
  • Trade Secrets Directive (EU) 2016/943
  • Unitary Patent Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012
  • Unified Patent Court Agreement
  • European Patent Convention 1973
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty 1970
  • Madrid Protocol 1989
  • Hague Agreement 1999
  • Lisbon Agreement 1958
  • Geneva Act 2015
  • Singapore Treaty 2006
  • Trademark Law Treaty 1994
  • Patent Law Treaty 2000
  • WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996
  • WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty 1996
  • Beijing Treaty 2012
  • Marrakesh Treaty 2013
  • Berne Convention 1886
  • Paris Convention 1883
  • Rome Convention 1961
  • Geneva Convention 1971
  • Brussels Convention 1974
  • Washington Treaty 1989
  • TRIPS Agreement 1994
  • WTO Agreement 1994
  • GATT 1947
  • GATT 1994
  • GATS 1994
  • GPA 1994
  • SPS Agreement 1994
  • TBT Agreement 1994
  • Anti-Dumping Agreement 1994
  • SCM Agreement 1994
  • Safeguards Agreement 1994
  • Agriculture Agreement 1994
  • Textiles Agreement 1994
  • TRIMS Agreement 1994
  • Balance of Payments Agreement 1994
  • Regional Trade Agreements 1994
  • Dispute Settlement Understanding 1994
  • Trade Policy Review Mechanism 1994
  • plurilateral agreements 1994
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the principle of sanctity of contract should be observed","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract clause 3.5, statutory instruments"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether or not plaintiff can lawfully apply the interbank rate to enforce payment of instalments","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clause 3.5(b), SI 33/2019, Finance Act"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether or not defendant has paid for the purchase price in full","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Payment history, currency conversion"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether or not defendant is entitled to transfer of the property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Full payment claim, counter-claim"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant and respondent entered into a property sale agreement in 2014 for US$60,000 with installment payments. In 2019, the appellant claimed arrears of US$9,619.13. The respondent argued the debt converted to Zimbabwe dollars at 1:1 rate by operation of law and claimed to have paid in full, seeking transfer of the property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →