Section 85(1) ConstitutionRight to propertyExecutionCustomary marriageDeeds Registry
Tags
Constitutional applicationProperty rightsExecution of propertyCustomary marriage
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Deeds Registries Act
Deeds Registries Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant should have pursued an appeal rather than a constitutional application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant did not appeal High Court order"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to overturn an extant High Court order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"High Court order remains extant"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's right to property under section 71(3) was infringed","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property registered in second respondent's name only"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, who was customarily married to the second respondent, sought to prevent the sale in execution of immovable property registered in the second respondent's name. The property had been attached by the first respondent to satisfy a debt owed by the second respondent. The applicant claimed a 50% share in the property and alleged infringement of her constitutional right to property under section 71(3).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases