Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Esther Ngaru v Livingstone Kusano

HH 265-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
28 May 2021
Citation
HH 265-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 265
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Muzofa J
Full Bench
Muzofa J
Areas of Law
Family lawCustomary lawCivil procedure
Keywords
Tacit universal partnershipUnjust enrichmentPrescriptionCustomary law union
Tags
Customary marriageProperty divisionPrescription
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Customary Law and Local Courts Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether prescription applies to a claim based on tacit universal partnership and unjust enrichment arising from a terminated customary law union","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff pleaded general law concepts; parties were in customary law union"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff and defendant lived together in an unregistered customary law union from 1982 until 2010 when the union was terminated. During their relationship they acquired both movable and immovable property. The plaintiff initially approached the community court for division of property and was awarded an immovable property by consent, but this order was later set aside by the High Court in 2020. The plaintiff then issued summons in October 2020 seeking division of immovable property based on tacit universal partnership or unjust enrichment. The defendant raised a special plea that the claim was prescribed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →