Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Ephraim Makaza v Patrick Marwizi and Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement

HH 346/12

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
19 September 2012
Citation
HH 346/12
Neutral Citation
[2012] ZWHH 346
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MATHONSI J
Full Bench
MATHONSI J
Areas of Law
Property lawSpoliation
Keywords
SpoliationModrosCaretakerLand reformPossession
Tags
SpoliationLand reformFarming equipmentPossession
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • s
  • p
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • d
  • r
  • i
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • ;
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether there are disputes of fact requiring referral to trial","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged meeting with Ministry official Mr Frank"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant exhausted internal remedies before approaching court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Availability of Ministry complaint procedures"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant was in peaceful and undisturbed possession of modros","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Caretaker appointment, equipment location, ongoing disputes"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant consented to removal of equipment","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's prior objections, prompt court approach"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, appointed caretaker of farming equipment (modros) on his allocated farm under Zimbabwe's land reform programme, sought spoliation relief after the first respondent dismantled and removed the equipment to his own farm with alleged assistance from Ministry officials. The parties had ongoing disputes over use of the equipment located on the applicant's farm.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →