Disciplinary proceedingsMisconductDismissal penaltyAppeal against dismissal
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the employer exercised its sentencing discretion irrationally by imposing dismissal when the guideline penalty for wilful disobedience was a written warning","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The guideline penalty was a written warning; the employer imposed dismissal"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant employee was dismissed for wilful disobedience to a lawful order during the COVID-19 pandemic. She cleared two South African nationals who were not truck drivers and had not been authorized by her superior, contrary to standing instructions aimed at containing the pandemic. Evidence showed money had passed hands to facilitate the clearance.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases