{"issue_text":"What constitutes the matrimonial estate to be divided equally","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Properties acquired during marriage, trust ownership claims, pre-marital acquisitions"}
{"issue_text":"How should the matrimonial assets be distributed to achieve 50/50 division","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property values, occupation of properties, investment purposes"}
{"issue_text":"What order should be made regarding costs of suit","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Conduct of parties, complexity of issues"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 1998 and had three children together plus a child from plaintiff's previous relationship adopted by defendant. Plaintiff issued divorce summons in 2015. Parties agreed marriage irretrievably broke down and agreed on custody terms. Main dispute was over division of matrimonial assets which parties had agreed should be divided 50/50.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases