Constitutional lawAdministrative lawCommercial law
Keywords
locus standiperegrinisecurity for costspublic procurementconstitutional validity
Tags
procurementtender challengeconstitutional challengeforeign company
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
Companies and Other Business Entities Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Does a foreign company (peregrini) have locus standi to challenge the constitutionality of Zimbabwean laws?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant is foreign company challenging constitutionality of procurement provisions"}
{"issue_text":"Must a peregrini pay security for costs before proceeding with a constitutional challenge?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant is foreign company that has not paid security for costs"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A foreign company registered in England and Wales challenged the constitutionality of provisions requiring payment of US$50,000 security to challenge procurement processes after being unsuccessful in a tender bid for prepayment meters vending systems.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases