constructive dismissalarbitrator jurisdictionregistration of arbitral awardrecusal
Tags
constructive dismissalarbitrationregistration of award
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Arbitration Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to proceed with quantification during pending appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's appeal pending, interim relief sought"}
{"issue_text":"Whether informal request for arbitrator recusal was sufficient","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant wrote letters requesting recusal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award was null and void and unregistrable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator refused to recuse himself, proceeded with quantification"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was constructively dismissed by the appellant and obtained an arbitral award. When she sought quantification of damages, the appellant objected and requested the arbitrator to recuse himself and stay proceedings pending appeal. The arbitrator proceeded and quantified damages. The High Court registered the award. The appellant appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases