None expressly quoted or interpreted. The Code of Conduct governing the respondent’s internal disciplinary process is mentioned as the source of the “internal remedies” that the applicant failed to exhaust, but no statutory chapter, section or subsidiary instrument is cited.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the application for review was properly before the court given the late filing and failure to exhaust internal remedies","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed 3 months late, no condonation application, internal remedies not exhausted"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought review of a disciplinary committee decision but filed the application three months late without seeking condonation, and had not exhausted internal remedies available under the Code of Conduct.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases