Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Earthrow Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Minister of Mines and Mining Development N.O. and Others

HH 823-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 November 2022
Citation
HH 823-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 823
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Ndlovu J
Areas of Law
Mining LawDeclaratory Relief
Keywords
Mining ClaimsCertificate of RegistrationKoo Doo MinePrior Pegger Rights
Tags
Declaratory OrderMining RightsLis PendensMaterial Dispute of Facts
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6)
  • Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996
  • Criminal Justice Act 2003
  • Criminal Appeal Act 1995
  • Senior Courts Act 1981
  • Supreme Court Act 1981
  • Magistrates' Courts Act 1980
  • Criminal Law Act 1967
  • Theft Act 1968
  • Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
  • Firearms Act 1968
  • Offences Against the Person Act 1861
  • Criminal Damage Act 1971
  • Public Order Act 1986
  • Terrorism Act 2000
  • Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
  • Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
  • Counter-Terrorism Act 2008
  • Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005
  • Extradition Act 2003
  • Crime (Sentences) Act 1997
  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
  • Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990
  • Drug Trafficking Act 1994
  • Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  • Fraud Act 2006
  • Bribery Act 2010
  • Serious Crime Act 2007
  • Policing and Crime Act 2009
  • Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
  • Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015
  • Investigatory Powers Act 2016
  • Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defence of lis pendens applies where there are separate review and declaratory applications","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"HC1465/18 review application pending; current application for declaratory order"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there are material disputes of fact requiring oral evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Differing expert certificates and coordinates produced by parties"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant is entitled to declaratory order confirming exclusive mining rights","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's prior registration in 2003; 4th Respondent's cancelled 2014 registration"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, Earthrow Investments, held mining claims for Koo Doo 62-65 since 2003 and sought a declaratory order confirming its exclusive rights. The 4th respondent obtained certificates for Koo Doo 62-63 in 2014, but these were cancelled by government officials. The applicant sought declaration that the 4th respondent's operations were illegal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →