Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Dzingai Nevhunjere v The State

HH 169-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
30 May 2017
Citation
HH 169-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 169
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Hungwe J
Full Bench
Hungwe J
Areas of Law
Criminal procedureConstitutional lawAbuse of process
Keywords
trial de novoabuse of processconstitutional rightsdouble jeopardystay of prosecution
Tags
abuse of processtrial de novoconstitutional rightsdouble jeopardy
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • (
  • s
  • .
  • 8
  • )
  • J
  • u
  • r
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • (
  • s
  • .
  • 2
  • 0
  • )
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
  • (
  • s
  • .
  • 2
  • )
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • I
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • g
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 6
  • (
  • s
  • .
  • 5
  • 4
  • )
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • (
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • .
  • 6
  • )
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the proposed third trial constitutes an infringement of the applicant's constitutional rights","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant has undergone two incomplete trials; State wishes to proceed with third trial"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application constitutes an abuse of process","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant has filed multiple applications to delay proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, charged with stock theft in 2002, has undergone two incomplete trials. After the first trial was quashed in 2007, a trial de novo was ordered. When the second trial reached closing stages, the applicant sought review, resulting in another order for trial de novo. The applicant now resists a third trial, claiming it violates his constitutional rights.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →