Dzingai Nevhunjere v Sam Parirenyatwa & 5 Others

HH 289-11

Analyze with AI

Case Details

Court

Harare High Court

Date

25 October 2011

Citation

HH 289-11

Neutral Citation

[2011] ZWHH 289

Outcome

unknown

Case Type

Application

Bench

Presiding

Mutema J

Full Bench

Mutema J

Areas of Law

Property LawInterdict

Keywords

boreholestate landcaretakerinterdictprovisional order

Tags

land disputeborehole rightsstate landinterdict

legislation

Statutes Cited

P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
a
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
Y
o
u
t
h
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
O
r
g
a
n
i
s
e
d
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
E
x
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
0
D
r
u
g
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
k
i
n
g
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
(
W
i
t
n
e
s
s
A
n
o
n
y
m
i
t
y
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
8
C
o
r
o
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
7
C
o
u
n
t
e
r
-
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
a
n
d
B
o
r
d
e
r
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
A
c
t
2
0
1
9
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
A
c
t
2
0
2
0
P
o
l
i
c
e
,
C
r
i
m
e
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
2
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
L
a
w
A
c
t
1
9
7
7
T
h
e
f
t
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
F
r
a
u
d
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
B
r
i
b
e
r
y
A
c
t
2
0
1
0
M
o
d
e
r
n
S
l
a
v
e
r
y
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
c
o
t
l
a
n
d
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
)
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
F
r
a
u
d
O
f
f
i
c
e
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
a
n
d
C
o
n
s
p
i
r
a
c
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
(
S
c
o
t
l
a
n
d
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
(
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
c
o
t
l
a
n
d
)
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
9
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
A
c
t
1
9
8
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
P
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
8
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
p
e
n
t
C
o
n
v
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
C
e
r
t
a
i
n
D
i
s
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
V
i
c
t
i
m
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
e
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
W
i
t
h
h
o
l
d
i
n
g
o
f
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
O
f
f
e
n
c
e
s
A
g
a
i
n
s
t
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
e
r
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
M
u
t
u
a
l
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
J
o
i
n
t
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
T
e
a
m
s
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
3
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
2
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
2
3

ai analysis

Case Summary

Key Issues

{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has established the requirements for a final interdict","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's lack of right to state land, first respondent's caretaker authority"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has any legal right to occupy and use the state land and borehole","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's unlawful occupation, first respondent's caretaker contract"}

This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.

background

Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to confirm a provisional order interdicting the first respondent from interfering with his farming operations and use of a borehole on state land adjacent to his Plot 8 at Danbury Park Farm. The first respondent claimed rights as caretaker of the homestead under authority from the Ministry of Lands.

Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases

Open in Zalari →

Zalari is Zimbabwe and Southern Africa's leading AI-powered legal research platform, built by DeepCounsel and powered by Nyamaropa Technologies. Search Zimbabwe Supreme Court and High Court case law instantly, get AI-generated answers with full source citations, and access the most comprehensive corpus of Zimbabwean and Southern African jurisprudence available online. Zalari is the go-to legal AI platform for attorneys, advocates, law students, judges, and corporate counsel across Zimbabwe and South Africa — delivering faster research, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in legal practice. Zalari does not provide legal advice. Always consult a qualified legal practitioner for advice specific to your situation. © 2026 DeepCounsel — a legal technology company democratising access to legal knowledge in Africa.