Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Dudzai Mureyi v Health Professions Authority of Zimbabwe and Pharmacists Council of Zimbabwe and Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe and Minister of Health and Child Care

HH 823-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
13 December 2017
Citation
HH 823-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 823
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mushore J
Full Bench
Mushore J
Areas of Law
Administrative lawConstitutional lawHealth professions regulation
Keywords
DatabaseHealth informationRegistrationFreedom of expressionRight to health care
Tags
Health lawConstitutional rightsAdministrative justiceFreedom of trade
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
  • Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
  • Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
  • High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the proposed database contravenes section 135 of the Health Professions Act","issue_type":"statutory","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Database provides information about health services and providers"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether MIS qualifies as a health institution under the Health Professions Act","issue_type":"statutory","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"MIS is an information service company, not a traditional health facility"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondents violated applicant's constitutional rights","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's rights to freedom of expression, access to information, and freedom of trade"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

A qualified pharmacist sought to establish an electronic database providing public access to health care provider information. After regulatory bodies refused approval, she applied for declaratory relief and mandatory approval of her proposed system.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →