Dudzai Mureyi v Health Professions Authority of Zimbabwe and Pharmacists Council of Zimbabwe and Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe and Minister of Health and Child Care
DatabaseHealth informationRegistrationFreedom of expressionRight to health care
Tags
Health lawConstitutional rightsAdministrative justiceFreedom of trade
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
Health Professions Act [Chapter 27:19]
High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the proposed database contravenes section 135 of the Health Professions Act","issue_type":"statutory","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Database provides information about health services and providers"}
{"issue_text":"Whether MIS qualifies as a health institution under the Health Professions Act","issue_type":"statutory","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"MIS is an information service company, not a traditional health facility"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondents violated applicant's constitutional rights","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's rights to freedom of expression, access to information, and freedom of trade"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A qualified pharmacist sought to establish an electronic database providing public access to health care provider information. After regulatory bodies refused approval, she applied for declaratory relief and mandatory approval of her proposed system.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases