improper citationstriking off rollEasipark HarareCity Parking
Tags
improper citationparty joinderapplication for leave to appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether City Parking was properly cited as 1st respondent in application for leave to appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"City Parking was not party to original proceedings; no transfer of undertaking"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought leave to appeal against a judgment where Easipark Harare was the respondent, but cited City Parking as the 1st respondent in the appeal application. The court found City Parking was not party to the original proceedings and there was no evidence of transfer of undertaking from Easipark to City Parking.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases