Labour lawEmployment contractsUnfair labour practices
Keywords
allowancesunfair labour practiceprescriptionappeal on point of lawcontinuing breach
Tags
unfair labour practiceallowancesprescriptionappeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the claims for allowances had prescribed under section 94 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allowances stopped in 2008-2010, claims raised 2014"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raised points of law as required by section 98(10)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All five grounds of appeal challenged"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant employer appealed against an arbitral award ordering reinstatement of various employment allowances. The respondent employee had claimed clothing, sports club, medical aid and vehicle allowances that were verbally agreed and paid but later stopped. The appeal raised prescription and whether grounds constituted points of law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases