{"issue_text":"Whether procedural irregularity of varying charges between suspension and dismissal vitiates disciplinary proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Different charges in suspension letter and dismissal letter"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employee was prejudiced by introduction of new charge at hearing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No prior notice of wilful disobedience charge"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent employee was suspended for allegedly intentionally damaging a machine but was subsequently dismissed for wilful disobedience to a lawful order, a charge not mentioned in the suspension letter, leading to an unfair dismissal claim.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases