{"issue_text":"What order of access should be made in favour of the Plaintiff in respect of the minor child Gitanjali Naran?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Previous access orders; curator ad litem report; children's counselling"}
{"issue_text":"The amount of maintenance to be paid by the Plaintiff for Gitanjali Naran until she attains majority or self-support","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Plaintiff's financial capacity; children's needs; defendant's claims"}
{"issue_text":"What is a fair and equitable distribution of the movables and immovable assets of the parties?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Assets acquired before and during marriage; trust property; companies"}
{"issue_text":"What order, if any, of maintenance should be made in favour of the defendant after divorce?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's age; capacity to work; plaintiff's offer"}
{"issue_text":"What order as to costs should be made?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Each party bore own costs"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 2000 and had two children. Plaintiff issued summons for divorce in 2017 citing irretrievable breakdown. Both parties sought divorce, custody of minor child, maintenance and distribution of substantial immovable and movable assets including properties in India, Zimbabwe and various companies.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases