Diana Eunice Kawenda and Lovenes Mudzuru v Minister of Justice Legal and Parliamentary Affairs and Minister of Health and Child Care and Attorney General of Zimbabwe
age of sexual consentconstitutionalitysection 81 of ConstitutionCriminal Law Codechild protection
Tags
constitutional challengeage of consentchildren's rightssexual offences
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Children's Act
Public Health Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether sections 61 and 70 of Criminal Law Code are unconstitutional for setting age of sexual consent at 16 contrary to constitutional definition of child as under 18","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Constitutional definition of child, statutory definition of young person"}
{"issue_text":"Whether current age of consent violates children's rights to dignity, equality, healthcare and protection from exploitation","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Rights under sections 51, 56, 76, 81 of Constitution"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Two young Zimbabwean feminists and human rights activists challenged the constitutionality of sections 61 and 70 of the Criminal Law Code which set the age of sexual consent at 16 years, arguing it conflicts with the constitutional definition of a child as anyone under 18 years and violates children's rights to protection from sexual exploitation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases