Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
Private Investigations and Security Guards Act
Public Finance Management Act
ZINWA Act
Water Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Ministry of Finance directive of 6 October 2022 affected the contract between the parties","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Treasury directive issued during contract period"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the defendant was liable for the outstanding amount","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract existed, services rendered, partial payment made"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the contract was contrary to public policy","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant is state entity, public funds involved"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff provided security guard services to the defendant from January to September 2022 under a contract requiring monthly payment upon invoice. After initially paying ZWL$18,771,510.25 of ZWL$47,344,619.61 invoiced, the defendant stopped payments claiming the contract violated public procurement requirements and that charges exceeded Ministry of Finance guidelines following a Treasury directive.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases